The Executive Council of the 35th Kyodan General Assembly period met for the
5th time, July 14-15, in the Kyodan conference room. The main issues
addressed at the previous meeting, namely the "recommendation for a minister
to resign" and his "admonition," were carried forward to this meeting, and
the debate was vigorous indeed. Before the vote was taken, four council
members walked out in protest, deepening the division further. Likewise,
there was strong debate concerning the proposal now being drafted for
presentation to the upcoming Kyodan General Assembly this fall to change the
Kyodan structure radically through a revision of its bylaws. With only three
months to go until the assembly, it is uncertain what will happen.
The following two articles taken from Shinpo (The Kyodan Times) summarize
these two points.?
I. Resolution to "Pursue the Admonition" Passes: Debate is Hot Concerning
the Legal Basis and Appropriateness of the Procedures
As the second day of deliberations came to an end, the "Petition to Carry
Out Admonitions Against Kitamura Jiro"was passed. This means that the matter
will be taken up by the Commission on the Ministry, which will determine
what actions will be taken against him.
Based on the decisions of the third meeting of the Executive Council in
October 2007, Kyodan Moderator Yamakita Nobuhisa sent a formal letter to
Pastor Kitamura stating that if he did not immediately cease from offering
communion to unbaptized persons, he would be asked to resign as a minister
of the Kyodan. Since Kitamura did not respond to this letter of admonition,
a new resolution was passed at the next meeting in February, to the effect
that if he continued this practice without the consensus of the Kyodan as a
whole, the Executive Council would be forced to follow through with its
admonition. He was asked to respond by June 20, 2008.
As Kitamura did not abide by this request, a formal admonition was passed on
the basis that his continued offering of communion to unbaptized persons was
in violation of the first and second articles of the Kyodan Constitution and
brought disorder to the church. During the debate swirling around this
issue, council member Umezaki Koji expressed his dissent, stating that the
Executive Council could not itself be the plaintive in this dispute, and
following Moderator Yamakita's response, Umezaki walked out, stating, "I
cannot be a part of this illegitimate discussion, as you have not spelled
out the legal basis for this in the bylaws." Council member Matsubara Shigeo
likewise walked out after expressing his opposition to the proceedings.
Council member Mukai Mareo expressed his opposition by posing this question:
"You say that offering communion to unbaptized persons is not permissible,
but where is this stated in the Kyodan Constitution and Bylaws? The Kyodan
is based on local church autonomy, and there are also examples of churches
in other countries where this is practiced." Ushiroku Toshiya claimed that
the procedure under consideration was outside the stipulations of the Kyodan
Constitution and Bylaws, and expressed doubts that the motion should have
even been introduced. Likewise, since such an indictment and admonition
require a two-thirds majority of council members to pass, he urged caution.
Others also expressed their opposition, including Saito Jin'ichi, who
likewise left the room, followed by others who walked out as the roll was
called.?
Those who supported the admonition were led by Moderator Yamakita, who
stressed that the regulations for church membership in the Kyodan
Constitution and Bylaws clearly included baptism as a prerequisite, and so
the very concept of unbaptized persons receiving communion was
inconsequential. Likewise, since unbaptized persons cannot participate in a
local church's annual assembly, they would be left in limbo. Council member
Sasaki Michio chastised those who walked out, saying, "This debate requires
us to all be on the same playing field. I want these illegitimate actions to
stop." He further stated that since it is the role of the Commission on
Ministry to carry out an admonition and it is the Kyodan General Assembly
that handles matters pertaining to the administration of communion, it is
only natural for the moderator to bring to attention any practices in this
regard that causes discord.
In response to one lay member's remark that this "is not a matter of life
and death or one that involves human rights," another lay member countered
that the matter is of? "supreme importance to the laity, since it relates
directly to our walk of faith." The exit of the several council members
caused the session to be extended for 15 minutes. When the final vote was
tallied, 16 of the 19 remaining council members had voted in favor of the
measure.?
II. Elimination of the Commission on Mission Proposed
On the second day of the meeting, after revision of church regulations
related the Board of Publications was dealt with, the following issues were
also discussed:?
1.? Revision of the Regulations on the Research Institute on the Mission of
the Church,?
2.? Dissolution of the Commission on Mission and Revision of related Bylaws,
3.? Revision of the Regulations Concerning Ministerial Qualifications,
4.? Application Process for Recognition as a Minister Under Special
Appointment, etc., and
5.? Cooperative Mission Covenants with the Presbyterian Church USA and the
Reformed Church of America.
As the proposals on revision of the regulations of the Research Institute on
the Mission of the Church and the dissolution of the Commission on Mission
and revision of related bylaws overlapped, they were discussed
simultaneously. Moderator Yamakita presented both proposals on the basis of
the report of the Special Committee on Church Structure. The proposed
revision of church regulations on the Research Institute on the Mission of
the Church is intended to clarify both the original purpose for establishing
the institute and its present role. The moderator explained that part 1 of
Article 41 of the Bylaws and Articles 3 and 8 of the regulations on the
Research Institute on the Mission of the Church have not been adhered to
since the time of the Kyodan's internal struggles. Thus, clarifying the role
of the Research Institute will result in the clarification of the
overlapping activities under the jurisdiction of the Commission on Mission,
which supports a proposal to eliminate the research institute.
Other reasons cited for the proposal include the fact that while the
research institute rethinks such things as basic mission strategies and
basic social action policies, it is the committees under the Commission on
Mission that actually do the work, so the committees under the Commission on
Mission could not do overall basic strategy planning. Therefore, the
proposal is to abolish the Commission on Mission and have its committees on
evangelism, education, and society become separate commissions. Various
bylaw changes will be necessary. There were 17 votes in favor of adopting
the changes in the regulations on the research institute. Likewise, the same
number approved presenting to the General Assembly this fall the proposed
changes in the bylaws that would abolish the Commission on Mission.
The regulations on the Research Institute on the Mission of the Church can
be revised by the Executive Council, but abolishment of the Commission on
Mission involves changes in the bylaws, which requires the consensus of the
Kyodan General Assembly. Council members opposed to the proposal stated that
bylaw changes should be dealt with first, before revision of regulations on
the research institute. On the other hand, the following quotes were
representative of those in support of the proposal: "The research institute
has not operated according to the purposes of its inception."? "Because
evangelism was placed under the Commission on Mission, evangelism has
stagnated."? "This is representative of the face of the Kyodan to come."
Other proposals that were approved included sending aid to churches that
suffered typhoon damage, resolutions relating to the celebration of the
150th anniversary of Protestant Christianity in Japan, and revision of
Article 4 of the ministerial qualifications. (Tr. TB)
Katsuyama Ken'ichiro
?Executive Secretary